whoever gets there first and gets the best ground is usally going to end up winning, so mobility is already a huge advantage over armor and / or better guns. Especially when you consider the maps are all designed around capturing and holding ground. The allies have plenty of faster tanks already than axis that can fight and win using mobility, they don't need 60's tech to win, that's just easy mode. What is the actual point of having a heavy tank or in fact any tank with armor which does literally nothing against shells which totally negate any armor that you have!! It's just beyond idiocy. Wow, the original designers must be so proud to know that their creations were fighting in virtual battlefields of the future against tanks designed 20 years later. The problem with WWII tanks facing post war tanks is huge! These tanks were designed to fight other WW2 tanks not some korea or 1960s, seriously the FV 4202 is from 1961!!!! your in a tiger 2 from 1944 facing a tank designed in 1961. So to say "Japanese forces may just be confronted with Asian maps", is not realistic.
In the 60second airraids, even if the player doesn´t operate Japanese vehicles.īut the number of players is still small ( 50.000 - 60.000 each evening ), versus the enormous number of game modes. What I really think is suprising, that japanese airplanes in WT, GF may appear over NorthAfrican desert battle scenarios,
#WORLD OF TANKS VS WAR THUNDER MOVIE#
Then it started that "WWII movies" were equipped with WWII equipment, taken from current still active war material.įeatured T-34's in service of peaceful Jugoslavia, with army crews as extras, performing the movie action ( no war film material! ).įeatured Heinkel-111 bombers and BF109 interceptors, built in license by Spain, which were at the end of the service at that time.Īnd I read with suprise the story of Panzer IVs of Syria
#WORLD OF TANKS VS WAR THUNDER TV#
In the movies and TV shows, it was popular in the 1950/1960th to show "modern" tanks as WWII tanks, especially US tanks as "German" WWII tanks. Well, WWII vehicles and planes were in operation until the 1970th or even later. Why we need to battle against cold war era tanks with WW II tanks? Or you would spontaniusly burst into flames by fuel and oil leackage, or you would spontaniusly die when you fire because of missfire. Or else a majority of all tigers, M4s, panthers, t34s and so on would not even get into battle because you spawn with a dead engine that you cannot repair or you would have to sit for 5min repairing it before you can du anything. Sure because warthunder is all about the realism? no they are not, they are realistic untill a point where it does not become fun anymore. If you want some BR changes then be more specific on the vehicle or vehicles your referring to. If you want a game with realistic scenarios stop playing WT. It's ridiculous how every single tank crewman stays in the tank after its penetrated, it's ridiculous that these tanks aren't breaking down, it's ridiculous that the tanks are constantly fighting each other without infantry support and the incredible weak artillery, it's ridiculous that some of these tanks even work like the Panther II, Tiger II (10.5 cm Kw.K), Ferdinand, Maus, M247.
0 kommentar(er)
